Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 21 2017

perohryz
11:07
1753 8d0e 500
Reposted fromlokrund2015 lokrund2015 viapknoe3lh pknoe3lh
06:21
3744 c386
Reposted fromoolong oolong viahgn hgn

June 20 2017

perohryz
19:19
4717 38d1
Reposted fromsohryu sohryu viabitstacker bitstacker

June 18 2017

perohryz
08:44
1839 082a 500
Reposted fromHereName HereName viapilsner1842 pilsner1842
perohryz
08:43
2108 205c 500
Reposted fromteijakool teijakool viapilsner1842 pilsner1842

June 16 2017

11:36
5745 0440
Reposted fromrhomaa2 rhomaa2 viaarachnephobic arachnephobic
10:19
2125 81f3 500
10:13
6028 1434 500

jordanparrished:

So somebody on my Facebook posted this. And I’ve seen sooooo many memes like it. Images of a canvas with nothing but a slash cut into it, or a giant blurry square of color, or a black circle on a white canvas. There are always hundreds of comments about how anyone could do that and it isn’t really art, or stories of the time someone dropped a glove on the floor of a museum and people started discussing the meaning of the piece, assuming it was an abstract found-objects type of sculpture.

The painting on the left is a bay or lake or harbor with mountains in the background and some people going about their day in the foreground. It’s very pretty and it is skillfully painted. It’s a nice piece of art. It’s also just a landscape. I don’t recognize a signature style, the subject matter is far too common to narrow it down. I have no idea who painted that image.

The painting on the right I recognized immediately. When I was studying abstraction and non-representational art, I didn’t study this painter in depth, but I remember the day we learned about him and specifically about this series of paintings. His name was Ad Reinhart, and this is one painting from a series he called the ultimate paintings. (Not ultimate as in the best, but ultimate as in last.)

The day that my art history teacher showed us Ad Reinhart’s paintings, one guy in the class scoffed and made a comment that it was a scam, that Reinhart had slapped some black paint on the canvas and pretentious people who wanted to look smart gave him money for it. My teacher shut him down immediately. She told him that this is not a canvas that someone just painted black. It isn’t easy to tell from this photo, but there are groups of color, usually squares of very very very dark blue or red or green or brown. They are so dark that, if you saw them on their own, you would call each of them black. But when they are side by side their differences are apparent. Initially you stare at the piece thinking that THAT corner of the canvas is TRUE black. Then you begin to wonder if it is a deep green that only appears black because the area next to it is a deep, deep red. Or perhaps the “blue” is the true black and that red is actually brown. Or perhaps the blue is violet and the color next to it is the true black. The piece challenges the viewer’s perception. By the time you move on to the next painting, you’re left to wonder if maybe there have been other instances in which you believe something to be true but your perception is warped by some outside factor. And then you wonder if ANY of the colors were truly black. How can anything be cut and dry, black and white, when even black itself isn’t as absolute as you thought it was?

People need to understand that not all art is about portraying a realistic image, and that technical skills (like the ability to paint a scene that looks as though it may have been photographed) are not the only kind of artistic skills. Some art is meant to be pretty or look like something. Other art is meant to carry a message or an idea, to provoke thought.

Reinhart’s art is utterly genius.

“But anyone could have done that! It doesn’t take any special skill! I could have done that!”

Ok. Maybe you could have. But you didn’t.

Give abstract art some respect. It’s more important than you realize.

Reposted fromziyoxis ziyoxis viaciarka ciarka
perohryz
07:49
perohryz
07:48
Reposted fromFlau Flau viateijakool teijakool
perohryz
07:47
7576 772d
Reposted fromgreensky greensky vianodifference nodifference
perohryz
07:44
1016 f7a3 500
Boże Ciało
Reposted fromstroschek stroschek
06:15
0602 002b 500

tastefullyoffensive:

Congrats. (via jgr6233)

Reposted fromryliceracc ryliceracc viajagger jagger
06:14
1056 23a9 500
Reposted fromgayscreaming gayscreaming viayouam youam

June 14 2017

18:52
9935 2974 500
Reposted fromefka-m efka-m viamoppie moppie
perohryz
07:49
9337 f884 500
https://xkcd.com/1849/ - Decades
"In the 90s, our variety radio station used the tagline "the best music of the 70s, 80s, and 90s." After 2000, they switched to "the best music of the 80s, 90s, and today." I figured they'd change again in 2010, but it's 2017 and they're still saying "80s, 90s, and today." I hope radio survives long enough for us to find out how they deal with the 2020s."
Reposted fromgruetze gruetze viahighlmittel highlmittel

June 13 2017

perohryz
06:12

June 12 2017

perohryz
21:09
3142 4b07
Reposted fromsosna sosna
13:40
4139 a51f 500
Reposted fromtron tron viafisti fisti
perohryz
09:53
7184 c2ca 500
Reposted fromwindingroads windingroads viadenian denian
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl